🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation may be passed soon.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to pass a law raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," stated the MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any action must be "grounded in strong data".

Previously, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity set up by the family of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material argues that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for children," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional government level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from various politicians to copy Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from these regions, other countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might backfire". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this international discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.